Pro camera: The pro custom camera

A post was split to a new topic: Coding Languages needed to make an extension

A post was merged into an existing topic: Coding Languages needed to make an extension

gordon after using image 1 inset component

Untitled

Can you give me a more accurate guide?

You should not be using Image, you should be using an arrangement (e.g. VerticalArrangement).

How about VerticalArrangement
Transfer the photo to the imagebox and rotate it and save it now !? :neutral_face:

Hard to rotate a VerticalArrangement. I do not think you cannot rotate its content.

Read the documentation.

?

1 Like

It will work with the Shared folder - but you may have got an incorrect path to it? You can also try the DCIM (Digital Camara Images) folder which some cameras use.

To what extent, what does that mean?

Re Tim's post. May require either a full path to the shared folder or a path to the App's own folder. Rudimentary given that the Extension is being re-written.

I don't understand what you are trying to tell me.

But as @Johannes_Ai2 and I said the path works
/storage/emulated/0/Pictures/

Julen's Project - it could have a typo, we can't necessarily see the whole path because of the text block's limited length. It's also possible that the camera defaults to a different directory, e.g. DCIM, or to the path mentioned by Tim.

I tested it on different devices (Android 9, 11) and it works with this path.

And it works completely without storage permissions on Android 11+ if the Image component is not used, but an extension to display the images.

....which doesn't sound right from a Google perspective. Possibly the App will be rejected by Play Store?

Not clear. Why should it?

The App stores images? Oh, your post is not clear - the Image component is for displaying not storing, so why would it have any effect on storage permissions?

The Image component incorrectly requests READ permission on Android 11+. On Android < 11 this is of course correct. So what is not clear about my statement?

Your statement should have included that.

No why? My statement was

and there is nothing to add to that (except maybe which extension).

I'm sorry Anke, it's just not the best English. It suggests that the Image Component requires storage permission even though it does not store anything - that should have been quantified.

Maybe, but then even Google and many other native English & American speakers (see e.g. here) also have problems with it: :wink: